Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Organization Exercises to the lecture • • • • Data Communication and Internet Technology More or less fortnightly Thursday 15:30 – 17:00 h Lecture hall AH 5 Presence exercise Note: exercise dates are oriented at lecture content! No fixed dates, only announcements in the lecture. First exercise date: November, 10th Material (Slide copies, exercise sheets, video recordings) Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 RWTH Aachen http://www-i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/content/teaching/lectures/sub/datkom/WS05-06/index.html Written exam At the end of winter term, February 24th Dr. rer. nat. Dirk Thißen Contact information Dirk Thißen Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4, Room 4226 (Building part E1) Phone: 0241 / 80 - 21450 E-Mail: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Otto Spaniol Chapter 1: Introduction Page 1 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Chapter 1: Introduction Page 2 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Content Literature and Related Courses 1. Introduction • A.S. Tanenbaum: Computer Networks. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, 2002. • Networks and Network Topologies • Communication Protocols 2. Computer Networks • Network principles • Network Components (Cables, Repeaters, Hubs, Bridges, Switches, Routers) • Local Area Networks (Ethernet, Token Ring, FDDI, DQDB) • Wide Area Networks (Frame Relay, ATM, SDH) 3. Internet Protocols • Internet/Intranet: the TCP/IP Reference Model • Network protocols (the Internet Protocol IP) • Next Generation Internet • Transport protocols (TCP and UDP) • J.F. Kurose, K.W. Ross: Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach Featuring the Internet. Addison-Wesley, 2002. • Cisco Systems: Internetworking Technologies Handbook. 3rd Edition, Cisco Press, 2001. Related courses: • Mobile Communications (starting Wednesday, 26th) 4. Application Protocols in the Internet • Higher protocols (FTP, HTTP, E-Mail, ...) Chapter 1: Introduction Page 3 Chapter 1: Introduction Page 4 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Data Communication Evolution of Data Communication Data communication is the processing and the transport of digital data over connections between computers and/or other devices (generally over large distances) The „driving power“ for the enormous growing importance of data communications: • Continuously decreasing costs for hardware... • ... while computing power is increasing. Data communication comprises two topical areas: Computer Networks → How to connect several computers? → Which media can be used for data transport? Example for comparison: → How to represent digital data on the medium? • • • • → How to coordinate the access of several computers to the medium? Communication Protocols (Internet Technology) → Design of uniform data units for transfer → How to achieve a reliable and efficient transfer? Page 5 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme A PC today costs less than € 1.000,It has more computing power than a 10 years old mainframe It contains more than 100 Million transistors A comparable number of other components would be prohibitively expensive – e.g. 100 Million sheets of paper would cost more than € 50,000,-. Computing power is nearly for free Page 6 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Applications Reducing Costs Sharing resources lowers costs Increasing computing power leads to new possibilities in data processing: • Speech processing • Image processing • Multimedia authoring • Video conferencing • ...... • Access to foreign resources by communication networks to achieve reasonable usage • Essential: Efficient methods to share data between the components of a distributed system • Procedures for efficient interworking (CSCW = Computer Supported Cooperative Work) • Agreements for shared usage of devices which are too expensive to buy for one single organization and/or have no use for the total capacity Increasing system diversity Increasing number of applications and users Wide range of usage: offices, factories, at home, … Chapter 1: Introduction Page 7 Example for interworking of two parties: Client/Server principle Chapter 1: Introduction Page 8 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme The Client/Server Principle Client/Server Systems Client Server Client Process Server Process Server Program (process) which offers a service over a network. Servers receive requests and return a result to the inquiring party. The services offered include simple operations (e.g. name server) or a complex set of operations (e.g. web server). Client Program (process) which uses a service offered by a server. Examples for Client/Server systems Request Network Network Reply Advantages → Cost reduction → Better usage of resources → Modular extensions → Reliability by redundancy Chapter 1: Introduction Page 9 Client Server WWW Browser WWW Server eMail Program Domain Name System (DNS) FTP Client FTP Server Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Page 10 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Another principle: Peer-to-Peer Non-technical Aspects Communication networks enable a faster and cheaper exchange/distribution of information. There is however a large number of social, ethnical, cultural, juridical, ... side effects. • Eventually dubious or forbidden contents • Responsibility • Juridical aspects (legislation) • Potential censorship? • Control over the productivity of employees, • Equal partners, no fixed client and server roles of the whereabouts of people • Connections between any pair of computers • Annoyance through anonymous or unwanted messages (SPAM) • Establishment of a whole network of connections • ...... • Best example: File Sharing, e.g. Napster, Gnutella Chapter 1: Introduction Page 11 Chapter 1: Introduction Page 12 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme First Generation Computer Networks Computing Center Operator Rest of the world Mainframe Telephone lines Computer Networks Demultiplexer Multiplexer Terminals Terminals Page 13 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Peripherals Page 14 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Introduction of Local Area Networks Global Networking Building A Building A Rest of the world Rest of the world (Internet) Clients Local Server Fixed lines, ISDN, Provider ... Fixed lines Switch Building B Computing Center Operator Computing Center Router Mainframe Router Server Network and system administrator Router Backbone Building B Router Clients Building C Local Server Switch Peripherals Terminals Peripherals Switch Mainframe Router Chapter 1: Introduction Page 15 Chapter 1: Introduction Page 16 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Classification of Networks Classification of Networks Point-to-Point Network • A pair of computers is directly connected by one cable Classification by Distance 1m Broadcast Network • One-to-all (e.g.: radio, television) • All connected stations are sharing one transmission channel • For ensuring that the data are sent the correct receiver, they have to marked with the destination address of the receiving computer • Data are being packed into packets with the Unicast Address of the receiver • Every computer connected controls each received packet for its destination address. Only the addressed computer processes the data, all others are simply deleting them. • To address all connected stations at once, so-called Broadcast Addresses are used Page 17 Chapter 1: Introduction Personal Area Network (PAN) 10 m Room 100 m Building 1 km Campus Local Area Network (LAN) Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) 10 km Town 100 km Country 1000 km Continent 10000 km Planet Wide Area Network (WAN) Internet Page 18 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Local Area Networks LANs: Bus • Communication infrastructure for a restricted geographical area (10 m up to some km) B Terminating resistor • Usually maintained by one local organization Example: Ethernet Ω • Linked are PCs/Workstations/...., for exchanging information and sharing peripherals and resources Ω A • Transmission capacity up to 1,000 Mbit/s • Transmission delay of a message in the range of milliseconds (~10 ms) Bus • Simple connection structures (“Simple is beautiful”) • Broadcast Network: if station A intends to send data to station B, the message reaches all connected stations. Only station B processes the data, all other stations are ignoring it. Topologies - (+) Passive coupling of stations • Bus • Star - Restriction of the extension and number of stations to connected LAN • Ring + Simple, cheap, easy to connect new stations • Tree + No choose of path to target (= routing) necessary • Meshed network Chapter 1: Introduction + The breakdown of a station does not influence the rest of the network Page 19 Chapter 1: Introduction Page 20 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme LANs: Star LANs: Tree Branch 1 Branch 2 Star A • Designated computer as central station: a message of station A is forwarded to station B via the central station B B • Broadcast network (Hub) or point-topoint connections (Switch) Repeater Example: Fast Ethernet Router Backbone – Expensive central station A C D – Vulnerability through central station (Redundancy possible) Tree + Definite path, no routing • Branching elements can be active (Router) or passive (Repeater) + N connections for N stations + Bridging of large distances + Easy connection of new stations + Adaptation to given geographical structure • Topology: Connection of several busses or stars + Minimization of the cable length necessary Page 21 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Page 22 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme LANs: Ring LANs: Meshed Networks Fully Meshed Network Ring • Point-to-Point connections between all stations • Broadcast Network B • Chain of point-to-point connections – For N stations, needed • Active stations: messages are regenerated by the stations (Repeater) A connections are – Breakdown of the whole network in case of failure of one single station or connection – Connecting a new station is a costly process + Large extent possible + No routing + Easy connection of new stations + Redundant paths + Only N connections for N stations + Maximal connection availability through routing integration • Variant: bidirectional ring Example: Token Ring, FDDI N ( N − 1) 2 stations are connected by two opposed rings Partly meshed network: cheaper, but routing, flow control and congestion control become necessary (Wide Area Networks) Chapter 1: Introduction Page 23 Chapter 1: Introduction Page 24 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme LANs: Examples Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) Ethernet (IEEE 802.3, 10 MBit/s) - originally the standard network - available in an „immense number“ of variants • Designed for larger distances than a LAN, usage e.g. in a whole town • Similar technologies as in a LAN • In general, only 1 or 2 cables without additional components • Main difference to LANs: Time slots Token Ring (IEEE 802.5, 4/16/100 MBit/s) - for a long time the Ethernet competitor - extended to FDDI (Fiber Distributed Data Interface) MAN Fast Ethernet (IEEE 802.3u, 100 MBit/s) - at the moment the most widely spread network - extension of Ethernet for small distances Gigabit Ethernet (IEEE 802.3z, 1,000 MBit/s) - very popular at the moment; 10 GBit/s are already in the planning phase at the moment Example: Distributed Queue Dual Bus (DQDB, IEEE 802.6) Page 25 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Wireless Networks • • • • Bridging of any distance Connects LANs and MANs over large distances Irregular topology, based on current needs Consists out of stations (routers) which are connected through point-to-point with each other • Mostly quite complex interconnection of subnetworks which are owned by independent organizations WAN Router Host Chapter 1: Introduction Page 26 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Wide Area Network (WAN) LAN Chapter 1: Introduction Page 27 • System Interconnections (PANs) • direct connection between the components of a computer (Example: Bluetooth) • Wireless LANs • Communication of computers connected by a base station (Access Point) in a local area, or direct connection between computers (Example: IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN, WLAN) • Range of 10 – 100 meters • Transmission capacity of up to 100 MBit/s • Wireless MANs/WANs • E.g. common telecommunication networks like GSM • Range of several kilometers (“worldwide”) • Transmission capacity below 1 MBit/s • IEEE WirelessMAN (IEEE 802.16) as MAN for data transmission Chapter 1: Introduction Page 28 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Standards Organizations - IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers - IEEE • Standardization e.g. of the IEEE 802.XStandards for Local Area Networks • 802.1 Overview and Architecture of LANs • 802.2 Logical Link Control (LLC) • 802.3 CSMA/CD („Ethernet“) • 802.4 Token Bus • 802.5 Token Ring • 802.6 DQDB (Distributed Queue Dual Bus) • 802.7 Broadband Technical Advisory Group (BBTAG) • 802.8 Fiber Optic Technical Advisory Group (FOTAG) www.ieee.org • 802.9 Integrated Services LAN (ISLAN) Interface • 802.10 Standard for Interoperable LAN Security (SILS) Communication Protocols • 802.11 Wireless LAN (WLAN) • 802.12 Demand Priority (HP’s AnyLAN) • 802.14 Cable modems • 802.15 Personal Area Networks (Bluetooth) • 802.16 WirelessMAN Chapter 1: Introduction Page 29 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Chapter 1: Introduction Page 30 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Why Protocols? Implementation of Protocols To enable understanding in communication, all communication partners have to speak the same „language“. → → → → → → → Data formats and their semantics Control over media access Priorities Handling of transmission errors Sequence control Flow control mechanisms Segmentation and composition of long messages → Multiplexing → Routing Solution 1: Write one large „Communication Program“ which fulfills all requirements needed to establish a communication process. • Advantage: efficient data exchange for a given application. • Disadvantage: No flexibility! Adoptions require large efforts. Solution 2: Write a set of small programs specialized to special tasks of the communication process. For each application, the needed programs can be combined. • Advantage: Very flexible, since single components can be exchanged. • Disadvantage: Fixed structures of program interworking; adds more complexity and overhead. A protocol is defined as the whole set of agreements between Accepted today: solution 2. application processes with the purpose of a common communication The implementation takes place in layer models. Chapter 1: Introduction Page 31 Chapter 1: Introduction Page 32 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Example: Exchange of Ideas between Philosophers Philosopher A Standardization Philosopher B Thoughts about world politics Language: Chinese Standardization Interpreter B Interpreter A Language: Chinese Indispensable for the area-wide practical use of communication systems: Language: Spanish Uninterpreted sentences, Language: Spanish i.e. no knowledge about politics additionally: English additionally: English Technical Expert B Technical Expert A Recognizes single characters and sends them in Morse • On the national as well as the international level! • Successful standardization is quite difficult due to: Complex technical problems have to be solved The involved parties, e.g. companies are often working against each other Confidentially restrictions hinder the information flow Uninterpreted characters in correct order Electrical signals Recognizes single characters and sends them in Morse Network Page 33 Chapter 1: Introduction • Consequence: Standardization processes are very slow (due to many, often non-technical reasons). Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Standards Organizations - ISO The ISO/OSI Reference Model International Standards Organization - ISO • Organisation, which is working on a volunteer basis (since 1946). • Members: standards organizations in approx. 90 countries www.iso.ch Page 34 Chapter 1: Introduction • Deals with a very broad range of standards • 200 Technical Committees (TC) for specific tasks (e.g. TC97 for computer and information processing) • TCs consist of subcommittees comprising in turn several working groups • Interworking with ITU-T regarding telecommunication standards, (ISO is a member of ITU-T). • Pioneering work of ISO regarding data communication: the ISO/OSI reference model • Notice: only the concept is pioneering – not the products developed from those concepts! Reduce the complexity of a communication process (all details to be considered) through layers. 7 layers: 7 Application 6 Presentation 5 Session 4 Transport 3 Network 2 Data Link 1 Physical Common services for the end user Criticism of the model: Network-independent end-to-end data transfer Layer 5 and 6 are rarely being implemented Addressing and routing of “packets” Generally to much overhead – some details are unnecessary, some are overloaded Securing of “frames”; Flow Control Signal representation, character transmission Transmission medium („Layer 0”) (OSI: Open Systems Interconnection) Chapter 1: Introduction Page 35 Chapter 1: Introduction Page 36 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Layer Tasks Layer Tasks 1. Physical layer This layer is responsible for transmitting single bits over the medium. Signal representation is defined here to ensure that a sent „1“ is understood by the receiver as „1“. For this, e.g. on a copper cable it is defined, which voltage is used to represent a „1“ resp. a „0“ and how long this voltage has to be for one bit. Moreover details are being defined like the type of cables, meaning of pins of network connectors, transmission direction on the cable (uni-/bidirectional), … 2. Data Link Layer Ensures an error-free data transmission between two neighbored hosts (e.g. in a sub-network). Therefore the incoming data are segmented into so-called frames which are being transmitted separately. The receiver, which identifies the start and the end of a frame e.g. with a bit pattern, checks if the transmission has been correct (e.g. with the help of a checksum). Additionally, flow control is used to control the re-transmission of corrupt frames and protect the receiver from overload. An additional task in broadcast networks is the control of medium access, i.e. the stations are coordinated in some way to prevent from access conflicts. Chapter 1: Introduction Page 37 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme 3. Network Layer This layer is responsible for the data transmission over larger distances and between heterogeneous sub-networks. The main task is (worldwide) uniform addressing of hosts and choosing a path through the whole network (routing). A necessary prerequisite for doing so is among other things a common address range and an agreement about a maximum size of the transferred data units. Intermediate stations (the routers) manage tables with routing information and use the uniform addresses to make a decision about the best path to the receiver. 4. Transport Layer (ISO/OSI) Layer 4 manages end-to-end communication between two processes. It is responsible for ensuring that the received data are complete and in correct order. For this, again flow control is used (sequence numbers, acknowledgements) to detect missing or wrong ordered data units. Beneath this, the current network state is considered to not only adapt to the receiver, but to the network capacities as well. Addressing is a topic here as well. On the transport layer, a single communication process on receiver side is addressed. Chapter 1: Introduction Page 38 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Layer Tasks Layer Tasks 6. Presentation Layer 5. Session Layer This layer (like the transport layer) manages reliable data transport between the computers. However also additional services are being offered, like e.g. the possibility for dialogue control. I.e. it can be defined in which direction the transmission can take place. Closely related with this topic is the token management which also belongs to level 5. During the transmission so called tokens can be exchanged. With certain operations only the communication partner which owns the token is allowed to conduct the operation. Token management is also used here for other purposes, i.e. a set of tokens exist to coordinate several operations. One important operation is to set synchronization points in the communication process, to restart the transmission at the point it has ended in case of a connection loss. Chapter 1: Introduction Page 39 The task of this layer is to display the data to transmitted that way, that they can be handled from a lot of different systems. So computers code a string with ASCII characters, others use Unicode, some for integers the 1-, other the 2-complement. Instead of defining a new transmission syntax and –semantics for every application, it is tried to provide a universally valid solution. Specific data are encoded in an abstract (and commonly recognized) data format before the transmission and are being translated back by the receiver into its own personal data format. 7. Application Layer (ISO/OSI) In this layer (standard-) protocols are being provided which can be used from a whole set of applications/systems. One example is file transfer. On the application layer a universally valid protocol including an interface of file transfer is being provided. For systems from different manufacturers only the link-up into the local file system has to be realized. Other examples are file transfer, e-mail, remote operations etc. Chapter 1: Introduction Page 40 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Interplay between the Layers The whole Communication Process • Layer (n-1) offers its functionality to the above lying layer n as a communication service. • Layer n enhances the data to be sent with control information (Header) and sends the data together with the header as Protocol Data Units (PDU). Application Layer • Two communication partners on layer n exchange PDUs by using the communication service of the nearest lower lying layer (n-1). n-PDU H Presentation Layer • For layer (n-1), these PDUs are the data to be transmitted. Layer n Application process H Session Layer Layer n Data Link Layer Layer (n-1) H Data Data Application Layer Chapter 1: Introduction Transport Layer H Network Layer T-PDU H N-PDU T Data Link Layer Layer (n-1) Physical Layer H: Header, e.g. control information of the layer Page 41 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Bit stream Transmission medium Page 42 Chapter 1: Introduction Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme The Communication Process The OSI Reference Model in the Network • Not necessarily a one-to-one mapping between layers • Depending on the protocol, n-PDUs can be segmented into several (n-1)-PDUs before transmission: Application process Application process Application Protocol Application Layer Presentation Layer Application Layer Presentation Protocol Session Protocol Session Layer Transport Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Host A Chapter 1: Introduction Session Layer S-PDU Physical Layer (n-1)-PDU Presentation Layer P-PDU H Network Layer Application process A-PDU H Transport Layer Data Page 43 Chapter 1: Introduction Transport Protocol Presentation Layer Session Layer Transport Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Data Link Layer Router A Router B Host B Internal Protocols Network Layer Physical Layer Page 44 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Standards Organizations - IETF The TCP/IP Reference Model Internet Engineering Task Force - IETF www.ietf.org • Forum for the technical coordination of the work regarding Arpanet, the precursor of the Internet (since 1986). • Evolution to a large, open, and international community of administrators, vendors and researchers. • Works on evolution of the Internet architecture and the smooth operation of the Internet. • Several working groups on Internet protocols, applications, routing, security, … • Standard draft proposals can become a full standard only if an implementation of the proposal is successfully tested at two independent locations for at least four month. • Result of such a standardization process: the resounding success of the Internet protocols TCP/IP Chapter 1: Introduction Page 45 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Application Layer Presentation Layer Don´t exist Session Layer Transport Layer Transport Layer Network Layer Internet Layer Data Link Layer Host-to-Network Layer Physical Layer ISO/OSI Chapter 1: Introduction TCP/IP Page 46 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme The Tasks of the TCP/IP Layers The Layers of TCP/IP Host-to-Network Layer (corresponds to ISO/OSI 1-2) Not defined exactly. The design does not matter, it is only defined that a host must be connected to the network via a protocol in a way that it is able to send and receive IP datagrams. The protocol design is left over to other standards to cover heterogeneous networks of all kinds. Internet Layer (corresponds to ISO/OSI 3) The term Internet refers here to the interworking of different networks, therefore not on the Internet itself. The protocol enables communication between hosts over the own network borders. In the Internet, the transmission is connectionless, meaning that the data are segmented into packets which are addressed and sent independently into the network. On each network border, a router takes over the forwarding of the packets. The choice of path can be dynamic, depending on the current network load. As a result, single packets can get lost by overload situations or received in wrong order. Such faults are not handled (this task is left over to the transport layer). In contrast to ISO, only one packet format is defined, together with a connectionless protocol, the Internet Protocol (IP). Chapter 1: Introduction Application Layer Page 47 Transport Layer (corresponds to ISO/OSI 4) This layer covers the communication between the end systems. To adapt to different applications, two protocols are defined. TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is a reliable, connection-oriented protocol to protect the transmission of a byte stream between two hosts. The byte stream is segmented to fit into IP packets. On the receiving side the packets are reassembled in the original order with the purpose of restoring the original data stream. It also includes flow control to adapt to the receiver‘s capabilities and to overcome the faults caused by the connectionless IP. UDP (User Datagram Protocol) is an unreliable and connectionless protocol („best effort“). No error correction is integrated, thus the transmission is used when the speed of the data transmission is more important than the reliability (speech, video). Application Layer (corresponds to ISO/OSI 7) This layer defines common communication services. This comprises TELNET (remote work on another computer), FTP (file transfer), SMTP (electronic mail), DNS („phonebook“ for the Internet), HTTP (used for World Wide Web), etc. Chapter 1: Introduction Page 48 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme OSI vs. TCP/IP OSI vs. TCP/IP 1. Time 4. Political reasons The TCP/IP protocols were already widely used before OSI had finished the standardization activities. 2. Freedom from obligation A „reference model“ like OSI is free from obligation. It only defines what is to be done, but not how to do it. Result: incompatibility of products. Very high and partly unneeded expense in the OSI specification (thousands of pages of specification descriptions). By the wish to consider all special cases, lots of options were included, making the products lavish, unhandy, and for too expensive - “The option is the enemy of the standard”! Page 49 Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 Kommunikation und verteilte Systeme And now… 1. Introduction • Networks and Network Topologies • Communication Protocols 2. Computer Networks • Network principles • Network Components (Cables, Repeaters, Hubs, Bridges, Switches, Routers) • Local Area Networks (Ethernet, Token Ring, FDDI, DQDB) • Wide Area Networks (Frame Relay, ATM, SDH) 3. Internet Protocols • Internet/Intranet: the TCP/IP Reference Model • Network protocols (the Internet Protocol IP) • Next Generation Internet • Transport protocols (TCP and UDP) 4. Application Protocols in the Internet • Higher protocols (FTP, HTTP, E-Mail, ...) Chapter 1: Introduction 5. Hurriedly product implementation The first OSI products were implemented too fast (driven by the success of TCP/IP protocols), were covered with faults, and had an overall low performance. 3. Complicatedness Chapter 1: Introduction OSI was dominated too much by Europe – especially from the national telecommunication companies which had lucrative monopolies. The real market power was in the USA – nobody was interested in OSI over there. Page 51 In contrast, the “theoretically far more unmodern“ TCP/IP protocols were continuously modified and improved. They were of a high quality level and successfully tested before deployment and cheap to buy due to high production numbers. Chapter 1: Introduction Page 50